As I mentioned before, my series looking at some of the characters from Harry Potter has concluded and today I am going to be starting a new series. I had an idea for what I wanted this next series to be about, but recent events have caused me to change my mind. In light of the fabulous recurve bow I received for Christmas and my newfound archery skills, I have decided to do a series on the most famous archer there is: Robin Hood. 
The Man Beneath the Hood
I doubt there is anyone who has not heard the name Robin Hood and some version of his story. Over the centuries his story has morphed and grown with each retelling. Today, most of us know him as a noble turned outlaw who lived in the Sherwood forest where he and his merry men would steal from the rich to give to poor. But how much of the legend is true? Did Robin Hood really exist and if so who was he?
Historians and scholars have been seeking the answers to these questions for years and none have been able to come up with any definitive answers. One of the earliest written records of a candidate for the famous outlaw comes from the year 1225. In an assize from York there is an entry for a Robert Hod, fugitive who had chattels worth 32 shillings and 6 pence. This same entry is included later with the addition of the nickname “Hobbehod”. Other than the name and the fact that he was an outlaw, there is nothing to connect Robert to the Robin Hood of legend.
Most of the other records of men with names that could be considered a variation of Robin Hood have something else that seems to disqualify them. Many of them were not actual outlaws and others appeared at a time too late to be considered serious candidates. There is evidence that the name Robin Hood was symbolic of outlaws as early as 1261 when an outlaw by the name of William son of Robert le Fevere is referred to in an official document as William Robehod. There are even some who believe that the name was never anything more than a symbol that various outlaws wore as a mantle. If he was a real man, though, the account of William Robehod seems to support the idea that he was around during the time of King Richard and Prince John or an even earlier time in history.
I am certainly no historical scholar, but it seems to me that if Robin Hood was based on a real person it was probably a compilation of multiple people. Thankfully, the people who are actual historical scholars agree with me. Score one for me.
There was a man named Hereward the Wake who was an outlaw in the time of William the Conqueror and fought against the Normans. Two centuries later Eustace the Monk left the monastery and became an outlaw. He began his career in the forest, but later moved to the Channel where he led a fleet of pirates. Around the same time as Eustace one of the more interesting candidates came on the scene.
Fulk fitz Warrin was a baron from Shropshire who had been a childhood playmate of Prince John. Beginning in the year 1200 he spent three years living as an outlaw in the forest after which time he was pardoned. It seems, though, that Fulk enjoyed the life of rebellion. In the year 1215 he left the king’s peace and joined the rebellion of barons who supported the Magna Carta.
On the surface, these three men may seem to have very little to do with Robin Hood, but there are many parallels between some of the things they are reported to have done and the stories of Robin Hood. Things like adopting the same disguises as Robin, such as a potter, and rewarding those waylaid for displays of honesty can be attributed to these men. It is also speculated that the idea of the displaced noble could have stemmed from Fulk.
There are many other names throughout the centuries that have been claimed by some to be connected to legendary outlaw. Whether or not any of them are the actual inspiration for the legend is not yet known, but it is fascinating to look through the possible candidates. And who knows, maybe one day the crucial piece of evidence will be found that definitively ties one of these men, or someone we don’t even know about yet, to the outlaw of Sherwood forest.
What are your thoughts on the search for the real Robin Hood? Do you believe he was a real person or a compilation of people? Or do you think that he was never anything more than a symbol with no historical counterpart? I would love to hear your thoughts in the comments.
I hope you plan on talking about the only Robin Hood that matters. And that would be Disney’s Robin Hood.
Maybeee…..you will have to wait and see
I agree, as with most legendary heroes, I think Robin Hood is an amalgam of personalities written down and told as tales, perhaps to scare or entertain the children, until they melded together across time.
If there was a real Robin Hood, King Arthur etc., then there would surely be recorded documents or more substantial evidence.
Great post, Jessica.
Completely agree (and as a little treat I will tell you that the original series I was going to do was on the Arthurian legend. I will still do it later though
)
As always, thank you, Martin!
I love Robin Hood in all forms, even as a cartoon. I am hoping that there will be a Robin Hood character in Once Upon A Time. They addes cinderella to the mix, so I think it could be a possibility.
Yes! I am really hoping for this, too! I love the character of Robin Hood and think that he makes pretty much everything better.
A few months ago I watched an excellent documentary on the History channel about Robin Hood. I really want to believe that he existed but maybe he had some helpers over time to tried to ride on his coattails and helped along his story. Everyone wants to be a hero after all. Maybe one good deed of his inspired some others after him to lend a helping hand.
Was it the documentary that went along with the Russell Crowe movie? If so, that was a great documentary. I would love to believe that he was a real person too. You never know, some historian may yet find proof of his existence. We can always hope, right?
“There are even some who believe that the name was never anything more than a symbol that various outlaws wore as a mantle.” WAIT. Are we talking about Robin Hood or Batman?
I’m not sure if Robin Hood was a real person or not, or even if he was based on multiple people. In a sense, it doesn’t even matter. He’s there to teach us a lesson, like Cinderella or Snow White from the faerie tales. It IS interesting, though, to think that one person may have created this legend that spawned the character that everyone knows about now. I bet he’s looking down on us and saying, “Well, that turned out better that I thought it would.”
“I bet he’s looking down on us and saying, “Well, that turned out better that I thought it would.”” – This seriously made me laugh out loud!
I love speculating on whether or not he was a real person and if so who, but I also agree with you that, in the end, it doesn’t really matter. His story is fun and exciting regardless of the answers to those questions.
Thank you for the comment and for the laugh!
You’re welcome! Sorry, I was logged in on my work blog (which I’ve yet to do anything with)…but that was me!
Ohh!! No wonder I enjoyed the comment so much
Of course there’s a Robin Hood! He hangs out with Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. If you believe, you believe. If you don’t, then . . . well what the heck’s wrong with you?
Robin Hood is the essence of good boy doing bad stuff to get attention. Deep down he’s really a good guy, kind, sweet, caring. On the outside, he’s tough, elusive, a little bit reckless. The kind of guy every girl wants to date, even if it’s just to piss her father off. He’s not the marrying, good-father type because he’s too restless, but he’ll pluck at your heartstrings just the same. And he’s fun and dangerous and makes you feel, reckless!
Robin Hood is alive and well. Like everything else, if you keep your eyes open, you’ll see him.
Happy new year, Jessica!
LOVED this comment! That is such a good description of what makes up a good part of his allure. Thank you so much for posting this comment.
Happy new year to you too, Patricia!
As sad as I am to see the Harry Potter series end, I’m excited that your next series is going to be on Robin Hood. I think he existed, but I agree with you that he was likely a compilation of more than one man. It makes sense to me based on the way stories evolve when told orally that the exploits of many men would soon become the exploits of one man over time.
Thanks, Marcy! And don’t worry, I’m sure I will return to Harry before too long.
You actually, in part, inspired me to make my next series about Robin Hood. I had a different character of legend in mind for this series and when you suggested a blog about the BBC Robin Hood series it got me thinking about blogging on the topic. Then my new hobby pushed me over to make the switch. I hope you enjoy the rest of the posts and thanks for the comment (which I completely agree with, by the way)!
I love learning about the origins of legendary heroes. Robin Hood and King Arthur are two of my very favorites.
So do I! King Arthur was the original plan for this series. He just got pushed back a bit thanks to the events of Christmas
Pingback: Robin Hood: The Evolution of a Legend « Jessica O'Neal
Pingback: Robin Hood: A Story Transcribed « Jessica O'Neal